This article discusses a different perspective of disaster movies in Japan distant from other countries. Reimagining World War II (WWII) as an aim of these movies is possible. As there are events of WWII in the essay, for example, atomic bombs. There is a sad ending in WWII while there are happy endings in these disaster movies. It might be implied as a hope as for WWII, to forget the tragedy in WWII.
It also demonstrates the relationship between the destruction and reconstruction of the city. As we all know, Japanese manners are important. It means the city is actually quite restricted. It is guessed that the Japanese may want changes. So they it can imply as they destruct the manners and reconstruct a more comfortable lifestyle.
—Hung Shuk Ki 3035840291
You touched on two possible interpretations of the disaster film genre in Japan, and they point to a relationship between the physical environment and the less tangible aspects of society. Can you clarify what you mean by ‘manners’ in your response? Do also be careful in your phrasing to avoid generalizations about culture.