Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Barthes, Leaving the movie theatre. Especially considering Man with a Movie Camera, (MWAMC) Barthes discussion points to a kind of dual watching and ‘situation’ that occurs with cinema. The practices and embodied experience around the viewing of a film and the making of a film are nodded to and part of the narrative of MWAMC as the act of looking and being looked at are layered in the film. We indeed experience the ‘narcissistic body’ when being fully immersed in the unfolding images, and the ‘perverse body’ that is more aware of the third space between yourself and the screen

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response Barthes R. AND Benjamin W.

Throughout different architectural style, we might perceive a different feeling or ambiance in a film. For example, we can feel more privacy in a house stairs, while exposed to public in school stairs. With people walking around the stairs, we can also feel the progressing or movement in time, which all of this is a matter of scale. From the first reading, cinematography hypnosis was introduced. It is stated that in a movie theatre, the audience can feel very attentive to the movie because of some important elements, such as, darkness, in which low light, silence, and undistracted environment create

Continue readingReading Response Barthes R. AND Benjamin W.

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Roland Barthes’s “The Rustle of Language” stirred up my curiosity and interest after I read it. The most reflective part I found is the difference between watching movies in the cinema and watching movie at home. From my personal experience, these two are really unique experience. Although they both have their good and bad, I think they are both essential for a movie lover. In the reading, Barthes further explained the characteristics and difference of these two kinds of movie-watching experience. There is a point mentioned in the reading by Barthes that I can not agree. It is about the

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response: Ronald Barthes

In “Leaving the Movie Theater”, the way Roland Barthes describe the sensation to leave a movie theater makes me realize that what affects the enjoyment of watching a movie is not limited to the movie itself, and not only the sensation of leaving the theater, but to the experience from going to the movie theater, watching the movie, and leaving the theater. There are many other external factors that can improve or affect our attention to the movie. Being in the movie theater allows us to fully immerse ourselves and our senses to the movie. The darkness, temperature, and sound

Continue readingReading Response: Ronald Barthes

Reading response :Roland Barthes

The author’s impeccable description of the theater environment and movie-going experience made me rethink my experience. I had two completely different feeling when watching a movie in a cinema and at home on my laptop. When I watch a movie at home, I can’t help but look at my phone from time to time, or I am easily distracted by the actions of people around me, which makes it difficult to focus on the movie. I often use the playback function of the video player. However, I could hardly be disturbed when watching a movie in the theater; my eyes

Continue readingReading response :Roland Barthes

[READING RESPONSE] Walter Benjamin

In his essay, Benjamin highlighted that aura – the “here and now” of an original artwork, is diminishing with the rise of technological reproduction. Despite lamenting the loss in artworks’ cultural value this caused, Benjamin, as a socialist, was supportive of this as it allowed the masses, instead of only the bourgeoisie, to appreciate artworks, reminiscent of how films were created for the masses. Benjamin saw political potential in films – a democratized medium which lacked an ‘original copy’ and aura. Yet, this was merely a potential, as even today, capitalists strived to insert aura into films. Studios release ‘Extended

Continue reading[READING RESPONSE] Walter Benjamin

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Nowadays, watching a movie become more and more convienient as we could watch it anytime, anywhere through online platforms, for instance Netflix, Youtube, etc. However, I believe that there is an element created by a movie theather that could not be replaced: Experience. Undoubtly, we, as audience, are influenced by the surroundings while watching a movie. From the reading, Barnes mentioned about the sharp contrast of the darkness of the theater and the only light from a movie creates an immersive experience for the audience。 Moreover, Barthes also mentioned about the “lure” that a theater can create, and the “lure”

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

[Reading Response] Walter Benjamin

The technological reproduction seem have many advantages to this world which having a rapid pace. Most of us chase a high speed and perfect life. This type of reproduction could  provide a high quality of product in a short time. But it is not suitable for artwork. In my opinions, the “aura” of the artwork means uniqueness. Because every art piece is different so they are special. The topics, colours, characters and anything in the artwork include the creativity of us. Now there are some AI program which can draw artwork. After you put down the topic, the program just

Continue reading[Reading Response] Walter Benjamin

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

In Leaving the Movie Theater, Roland Barthes briefly discussed how elements such as darkness and sound functioned as “prerequisites for hypnosis.” Cinema is a matter of what is in the frame and what is out (Martin Scorsese). The fantasy created by a movie, a “reel world,” can be a perfect choice for the audience to escape from the real world or an elaborately crafted mirror to reflect reality.   Because of my strong empathy ability, I could always integrate into any character in any movie, regardless of gender, identity, or even species. After watching A Dog’s Purpose, I still remember the

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading 1 Response

Benjamin Walter’s perception of art can be boiled down to its undeniably alluring aura. Famous arts, such as Rembrandt’s paintings and Bach’s compositions, can even invoke such authority that it has been considered the evocation of God. Real, handcrafted Greek art pieces are immortalized even after their physical state has degraded over millennia, in contrast to images found on the internet nowadays; digitally eternal, but easily forgotten. The “wow” factor of art, known to be handmade and seen in person, in my opinion, still outweighs the “marked” and proven originality of beautiful digital art pieces. Imagine entering the Florence Cathedral,

Continue readingReading 1 Response