This article explores the intricate relationship between urban space and social marginalization. It is mentioned that the sense of homelessness is a common issue among middle- and lower-class people during tough times, as they are anxiety about uncertain future. The article further asserts that architectural styles serve as cultural and ideological manifestations, with a primary focus on Hong Kong’s public housing estates. Therefore, it contends that they epitomize the darker aspects of local culture and represent Hong Kong’s difficulty. Initially, public housing was driven primarily by economic interests, aimed to attracting low-paid workers, rather than welfare considerations. Over time, these houses became home to the most underprivileged people. And in some early films, these estates were described as ghost towns. Because disadvantaged groups have been neglected by the government for years. These groups are like ghosts without existence in the city.
I partly agree with the article’s perspective that public housing estates reflect the negative side of Hong Kong. While Hong Kong is often hailed as an international metropolis with skyscrapers and fantastic city lights, it also shows its high population density. The housing problem has remained unresolved for decades. And its resources remain strained, with an average waiting time of 5.8 years and increasing. Residents in public housing estates often face challenges such as limited living space, poor ventilation, and inadequate facilities. In contrast to Hong Kong’s glamorous facade, the struggles of the lower class reflect the wealth gap in the city.
Finally, it is interesting that the article mentions constructivism at the end. Based on their experiences, individuals may form their own perception of life, the city, and space. Therefore, whether one feels a sense of belonging or isolation from this city, no one can truly tell.
– Hung Hiu Yi (3036141147)