Reading response: Joseph Rosa

In most movies that contains architecture and family definitions as a representation of character identities during the period 1930s-1990s all conducted traditional structure as warm, normal and satisfied, which shown in traditional family structure and positive character. On the other hand, the new structures, especially the apartments conduct the character as abnormal and negative, including the LGBT group, the weirdos and single elder generations. Also, during the period of wars and turmoil, the breaking of the new architecture can be witnessed int eh movies like the series of James Bond. After this period, the diversity and uncertainty are shown in

Continue readingReading response: Joseph Rosa

[Reading Response: Joseph Rosa]

From this article by Rosa, the relationship between modern domestic architecture and movies has been discussed. Upon this understanding, we could further think about the interactions in between film and architecture industries. Film makers certainly take lots of inspirations from the architects. An example that has been shown in this article is the influence of the famous modern architect John Lautner on Hollywood productions in the late 18th century. Lautner’s 1960’s creation, the Chemosphere, is a UFO like structure with circular ceiling, perimeter glass walls and middle concrete supports. The building looks fantastically futuristic on the hill side and was

Continue reading[Reading Response: Joseph Rosa]

[Reading Response: Joseph Rosa and Pamela Robertson Wojcik]

After reading Joseph Rosa Pamela Robertson Wojcik’s article, these are some of my understandings and feelings. Rosa’s article mentioned the modern and traditional styles of houses in the movies; Americans have never entirely accepted modern architecture as their home, and most Americans prefer the conventional home, whether in film creation or life. Also, there’s a big difference between living in apartments and a penthouse; people in penthouses live in the present, look to the future, and care little about the past. The article has shown that if people fall in love, get married, or have children, and they will choose

Continue reading[Reading Response: Joseph Rosa and Pamela Robertson Wojcik]

[READING RESPONSE] Joseph Rosa and Pamela Robertson Wojcik

Both Rosa and Wojcik demonstrate the way modern domestic architecture helps to construct the film narrative and reflect the phenomenon and problems in modernism and urbanism, with a particular insight into the classical Hollywood movies in the sixties and seventies. In Rosa’s, there is a mutual dynamic between architecture and film in that “Hollywood films have both reflected and shaped American views about modern domestic design.”1 On one hand, the setting of modern dwellings presents urban life, along with technological and social developments. On the other hand, modern domestic architecture has fallen into a stereotype that arbitrarily and consistently associates

Continue reading[READING RESPONSE] Joseph Rosa and Pamela Robertson Wojcik

[READING RESPONSE] Joseph Rosa

In the early days, there was a fear that modern homes would have a negative impact on traditional family ties. The link between traditional architecture and traditional happiness was also emphasised in the films. The author cites several films to depict villainous characters mostly living in modern homes. The houses are also mostly built on top of the mountains, isolated from the rest of the world. The modern homes have a unique design with large expanses of floor-to-ceiling glass, concrete, minimalist interior arrangements and extensive use of cool colours. These designs make the houses look expensive but always feel cold,

Continue reading[READING RESPONSE] Joseph Rosa

Reading Response: Joseph Rosa AND Pamela Robertson Wojcik

Through the selected pages, it is using the department plot as a lens to look at the architecture and film. The occurrence and development of the department links to the process of urbanism. Filmmakers noticed this relationship and tried to present this kind of linkage by film and TV production. For example, the changing relationship between neighbors and the movement in racism drives the movement of urbanism. Through the way that apartments were presented in films, we could see some stereotype to this kind of modern architecture, and thus, see people’s altitude towards modern architecture in the 20th century. In

Continue readingReading Response: Joseph Rosa AND Pamela Robertson Wojcik

[Reading Response]: Joseph Rosa

In the mid-20th century, modern domestic architecture was considered more appropriate to be a workspace than a home, due to the fear of technological and scientific advances. Under these circumstances, Hollywood movies use modern style white-walled architectures to emphasize antagonists’ characteristics. Movie producers tried to connect their created villains to certain modern forms of architecture. For example, in the James Bond series, the master criminal was set in a house of ‘poured-in-place concrete’ in the middle of the Nevada desert. This technique of forming the concrete makes the architecture lose the sense of warmth and affection as a home, which

Continue reading[Reading Response]: Joseph Rosa

Reading Response: Joseph Rosa

At the end of 20th century, modern domestic architectures are always related to fear, evilness and other negative issues in films (Rosa 2000, 159-167).  By contrast, when modernism first appeared, people hold a much warmer attitude. This may related to the development of high technology and their influence on people. During second industrial revolution, when the concept of modernism was first promoted, life was flourished by those dramatic changes. Contact across the ocean, convenient trips around the world, cars became accessible for middle-class family. Modernism meant a better future. However, the cold war makes people be aware of how dangerous

Continue readingReading Response: Joseph Rosa

[Reading Response] Joseph Rosa

In this week’s reading, we learned that the modern architecture is often regarded as cold and more related to bad things such as crimes in the movies, while the traditional style of houses are more considered as warm and closer to people’s heart. For example, in the movie L.A. Confidential, the female character’s true bedroom is  decorated in traditional style, which shows that this is the way of decorations that could make her feel warm and safe while the other area decorated in more urban style is not what she values. However, this kind of stereo type is not always

Continue reading[Reading Response] Joseph Rosa

[Reading Response] Joseph Rosa

Personally, I have never paid much attention towards how the architectural style of buildings in films have a direct linkage towards the ambitions and personality of the associated character. In the text, Rosa illustrates that throughout the years, films have often depicted modernist residential architecture to associate with antagonistic characters, representing a rather derogatory connotation to the building. On the other hand, traditional homes are represented to express feelings of comfort, warmth and positivity. This directly highlights how the American public first witness the rise of Modernism, in which critics and conservatives view these rigid and scientifically complex structures as

Continue reading[Reading Response] Joseph Rosa