Reaing Response: Roland Barthes

The text reminds me of my own experience watching movies in the cinema. The realistic image technology and sound effect provide me with an immersive movie-watching experience ( except for some noise from other audiences). Therefore, the contrast between watching and leaving the theatre is giant and I would be still immersed in the plot. Due to the realistic image content and film production, it may make the audience feel that the movie plot is happening in a trance. In the article, the author provides a new thought and consideration about the function of a movie theatre for me. The

Continue readingReaing Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response: Walter Benjamin

This article mainly discussed the impact of industrial reproducibility on traditional arts and new arts (film, photography) that are inherently reproducible. In contrast to many other intellectuals at the time (for example, Theodor Adorno), Benjamin held a positive attitude towards the revolutionary transformation in arts that technology had brought. A key idea in this article is the concept of “aura”. The aura exists only on the original artwork based on art’s authenticity–the uniqueness of time and space where the art piece was created and was rooted in art’s ritual functions in human history. However, as technological reproduction emerged, works of

Continue readingReading Response: Walter Benjamin

[Reading Response: Roland Barthes AND Walter Benjamin]

There could be thousands of reasons why people enjoy films. Still, there is one thing in common for all of them: in a movie, everyone can experience an unrealizable life, visit an unreachable place, break the fetters from space and time, and do whatever one wants. The article by Roland Barthes embodies it as an illusory feeling. Interestingly, the author used a lot of descriptive words and metaphors when he was trying to narrate the illusion, including the surroundings in a cinema, the feelings, the atmosphere, etc., instead of expositing concepts and theories behind it directly from a scientific perspective.

Continue reading[Reading Response: Roland Barthes AND Walter Benjamin]

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Before reading Roland Barthes’ article, I have never realized such detailed influences on audiences’ impressions and spirit from the cinema. Barthes’ description of the visual effects, sounds, lights, environment, and all these miracles of the ingenuity of movie theatre is figurative, with subtle words, reminding me of the feeling in cinema. The stimulation created by the sudden lights off and the first sound emitted is undeniable, the romantic atmosphere due to the reflection on faces from the screen brings excitation as well. Although he wrote about his fascination with films and theatres, the title is named ‘Leaving the movie theatre’.

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

This article from Roland Barthes talks a lot about the meaning behind the lighting and equipment in cinema. I think there must be a reason for every placement and presentation. For example, the darkness of the cinema allows the imagination to run wild and the audience to become more engaged by relaxing in the chair. At the same time, the images of a film can make us concentrate more on the scene. In the cinema, no matter how far away we sit, we can’t help but get closer to the screen because the image draws us in and catches our

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response: Walter Benjamin

Benjamin’s writing introduced me to the idea of technological reproduction and allowed me to connect such concepts to the status quo. Technological reproduction allows artworks to be spread and made accessible easily. For instance, digital copies of a physical or ancient painting, or simply a photograph, as people across borders can reach out to these media anywhere, anytime. artworks and the idea of art are popularized, but as they become more accessible to the public, it also makes them fall victim to commercialization. This reminds me of NFTs, which can be understood as a collection of pricey digital icons nowadays.

Continue readingReading Response: Walter Benjamin

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Barthes’ piece of reading serves as an epiphany to me.  Watching a movie in a movie theatre makes me feel immersed, possibly due to the dark lighting and an almost ceremonious atmosphere, allowing me to better immerse myself in the massive projection on the screen. The technology inside also plays a significant role in ensuring a realistic and enjoyable experience, like 360 reality audio, 3D effects, or even 4D elements. To me, going to the cinema seems more thrilling than watching a film elsewhere. Maybe I have long been infatuated with the idea of watching it in the theatre, more

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Personally, I can relate to the dazed and confused feeling Roland Barthes describes after watching the movie and leaving the theatre. Yet, the shift in our focus toward movies throughout time has changed our viewing experience as well. In the past, going to the movies was our major form of entertainment. But, today, it serves as only a small part of our day. Movies do not imprint a lasting impression on us as much as before. Especially with technological advancement, it has enhanced, yet robbed our cinematic viewing experience. Being able to watch movies “on the go” with Netflix or

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Walter Benjamin

At first, the essay discussed how the technological reproducibility of art takes away the uniqueness and authenticity of the artwork, which he called the aura of art. This statement reminds me of an artist named Andy Warhol, who was famous for doing repetitive screen printing pop art. It makes me wonder if will Benjamin thinks Andy Warhol’s works have no ‘aura’. Benjamin worried that the technological reproducibility of art can be used in politics as the production of propaganda can be extremely efficient and impactful through art. Then when I continued reading I realised Benjamin was not totally pessimistic about

Continue readingWalter Benjamin

Reading Response: Walter Benjamin

In his essay, Benjamin emphasized the importance of authenticity in an art piece and hence, objected to technical reproductions, regardless of the perfectness, referring to them as objects that had been deprived of historical testimony and physical duration. The basis of his viewpoint stands on the fact that technological reproduction is more enhanced than the manual counterpart and that it empowers artworks to be displayed distinctive to their original form. His understanding, as I comprehend, is restricted to his era of primitive means of technological reproduction and might be challenged by new advancements such as 3D projection and AI painting.

Continue readingReading Response: Walter Benjamin