[Workshop 1] Q&A with Second Chan – Q2

From Sherman Shui Fung Lo : Hello, I think it is interesting that it is possible to portray one city when you’re filming entirely in another city. Does it reflect one of the effects of globalization, where the cityscape are general enough to all look the same, to the point where it can fool the audience? Following this line of thought, do you think that the tiny details such as street signs, fences, trash cans, posters etc of a city is the defining features of the modern city?

1 thought on “[Workshop 1] Q&A with Second Chan – Q2

  1. Second says:

    Fooling audience is NEVER our objective. We switch city because it is necessary. What is point of fooling the audiences and creating so much troubles in our works at the same time?

    When you define a work, a person, or anything, it all comes into details. DETAILS DETERMINE SUCCESS.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.