(Reading Response on: Leo Ou-Fan Lee’s essay on the urban milieu of Shanghai cinema in the 1930s)
In this article, Leo Ou-Fan Lee unravels the complex relationship that existed between Shanghai’s 1930s print culture and the nascent Chinese film industry of the same period. Lee argues that the early development of Chinese cinema was largely a societal reaction to the emerging demand for entertainment, deeply entwined with the prevailing literary scene. He examines how film-going affected the tastes and societal behaviors of the Chinese public and explores the dynamic exchange between film productions and the broader culture of the urban landscape.
Lee’s essay, grounded in a historical context, prompts me to consider its implications for the current Chinese film industry, particularly in light of the digital age and the rise of online platforms. He poses a relevant question: How heavily are the creative ventures of today’s filmmakers shaped by the legacies of print culture and the modern-day digital landscape?
In my opinion, in the context of fierce international competition in the film industry, understanding and catering to viewer preferences is critical for filmmakers who aim to stay significant while fostering creative originality. Evaluating the trajectory of media development also sheds light on its impact on the various facets of Chinese cinema—its creation, distribution, and consumption—and paves the way for the industry’s advancement.
Therefore, Lee’s scholarly examination serves as a catalyst for in-depth inquiry, encouraging us to dissect the persistent interplay between literary heritage and film, and to consider how this relationship has influenced the progression of Chinese cinematic storytelling.
word count: 244
Xiong Na (Zona) 3036260345
Well-structured layout and extrapolation of the central conflict from this article, which you gauge the importance of concisely. Do you believe that all films people resonate with nowadays require filmmakers to be conscious of this connection between film and the digital landscape and to actively interact with it?
Thanks for your question Oscar.
Indeed, the question highlights a crucial aspect of contemporary filmmaking and its reception by today’s audiences. In today’s context, I would say that the digital landscape undoubtedly shapes both the creation and consumption of films, but the extent to which filmmakers need to be conscious of this connection varies.
I would say the impact of the digital landscape on filmmaking varies depending on the project and its audience. While digital platforms offer filmmakers new ways to reach viewers and tailor stories, not all films need to focus on this interaction. Some narratives benefit from traditional techniques or themes that resonate beyond digital trends, appealing to audiences seeking escapes from the digital world. From my perspective, it’s important for filmmakers to be aware of digital influences but also to prioritize storytelling that speaks to human experiences meaningfully. All we need to do is to balance the advantages of the digital age with the timeless essence of storytelling.