Roland Barthes analysis of “Leaving the Movie Theater” examines how watching films passively can influence our minds. He believes that cinema’s immersive environment can put us in a sort of trance offering both an escape and a way to shape our beliefs. The contrast, between this viewing experience and the active participation required in art forms raises important questions about how movies contribute to societal norms through storytelling. Barthes explores how cinema captures a contradiction by blending connection with isolation. This dual nature reflects a conflict, where movies can bring people together and create a shared sense of belonging while also prompting deep personal reflection showing how they have the power to both unite and divide individuals. This contradiction highlights the dilemma where technology promise of connectivity often leads to increased feelings of loneliness. By critiquing this phenomenon Barthes subtly challenges the role of media not in shaping our view of the world but, in influencing our relationships with others suggesting that even when we share space or stories our experiences and interpretations remain uniquely personal. This perspective encourages us to rethink how watching movies impacts our sense of community, identity and social interaction in todays interconnected society.
Essentially movies have the ability to bring people together through shared moments. They also highlight a kind of personal reflection showcasing the ongoing balance, between independence and community, in todays society.
-Li Xiaoping 3036066464
I appreciate your writing. The text seems to be a summary of Barthes’ article, rather than a response to his idea. To improve this, there are some questions for you to answer. How does watching films passively influence your mind? In your idea, how do movies contribute to societal norms? You should elaborate more on ‘how watching movies impacts our sense of community, identity and social interaction in todays interconnected society’ by using your own words.