Reading Response: Walter Benjamin

After reading Benjamin’s article, I found the word ‘authenticity’ quite inspiring. As Benjamin has defined, the authenticity of an object is the quintessence of all that is transmissible in it from its origin on. An alternative way to represent ‘authenticity’ is to understand the here and now of the artwork. From my perspective, the here and now refers to the specific space and time point of the artwork respectively. Such properties will change across time  in that the artist created his/her artwork at certain time and certain location, which enables the artist to cultivate specific emotions and meanings into that

Continue readingReading Response: Walter Benjamin

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

In my opinion, the article “Leaving the Movie Theater” is trying to analyse the experience of going to the movie theater to see a movie. Since we have all experienced that feeling of coming back to reality when leaving the theater, the author believes that watching a movie is hypnotic, but he is aware the he is two persons in the cinema. The first one is absorbed to the movie experience like a person peering through a keyhole, and a second person who is trying to observe things around him in the theater. I think the author likes going to

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response: Walter Benjamin

The main point I focus on is Benjamin’s proof that reproduction works lack authenticity, which is an important characteristic of the artwork. Benjamin reasoned that the reproduction work is independent of original work and hold characteristics different from original artwork. I think it’s fully conceivable since the song sung by a chorus could be originally only available in open space like church, but now could be recorded and be enjoyed in a private room. This really makes a big difference in the aesthetic perspective of the song. This opinion also suits the quintessence ranging from physical duration and historical testimony

Continue readingReading Response: Walter Benjamin

Reading Response: Walter Benjamin

Benjamin’s work expressed his critics and reflection on the production of artworks under the rapid development of technological reproduction, with an emphasis on the art of film. One argument in his work that has triggered my interest is his claim that film, as opposed to painting and some other forms of art, can manipulate individual thoughts by collective reactions. To me, Benjamin’s opinion is very visionary. In the 21st century, critics and comments about all sorts of arts, not just films, can be easily found on the internet due to the technology boom. Just by reading those words can people

Continue readingReading Response: Walter Benjamin

[READING RESPONSE] WALTER BENJAMIN

In this book, Walter Benjamin shows his concern about art in the period of technological revolution. The essence of artwork is a concept called aura, which Benjamin thinks suffers a loss during technological reproduction. On the one hand, authenticity is part of the aura, which is created by the specific historical background of a work of art. However, reproduction makes the product independent from historical content and destroys its uniqueness. On the other hand, Artwork loses its cult value when the reproduction happens. Cult value is created by distance, including both physical and aesthetic distance. Physical distance (time, space …)

Continue reading[READING RESPONSE] WALTER BENJAMIN

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Barthes put forward the concept”cinema situation”, describing the film as a “lure”. Compared to watching TV at home and watching shows in a “legitimated theater”,  the uniqueness of watching a film in cinema lies in the immersive trap. That is, the environment of the cinema( including the light of the screen, the sound, even the audience sit beside you) and all the ideological discourse (especially image-repertoire) effect with each other, creating a hypnotic atmosphere. In my mind, Barthes’ attitude towards movies is critical but hopeful. In an era when the cinema first came into the public eye and the role

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading Response : Walter Benjamin

Walter Benjamin explored the rapid production of artwork and argued that technology has changed the perception of people on how art is viewed and experienced under different circumstances. Originally, artwork was associated with traditions, heritage, and aura. However, mechanically reproduced artwork changed these views and is mostly characterized by repeatability. Artwork was used for ritual practices by the Greeks to represent their cult and as a means to reach God, something they couldn’t physically touch. In the modern days, due to mass reproduction of artwork, the social use of artwork have changed to political practices, losing not only its aura

Continue readingReading Response : Walter Benjamin

Reading Response: Roland Barthes

Reading this text has given me another set of perception on films I have never thought of, which is deeming films as another form of hypnosis. Every time I watch a film and come out of the cinema, I feel like I had stopped in time and had left reality for a bit. After reading this text, I finally realized what made me feel this way; it was the atmosphere the cinema creates when watching a film. As I am placed in a confined room with barely any lights except from the screen, I am automatically glued to film and

Continue readingReading Response: Roland Barthes

[Reading Response: Roland Barthes]

What is the charm of a movie theater? What leads people to enjoy movies in the cinemas? These are the questions that I’ve always wondered about but couldn’t find the answers. However, after reading “Leaving the Movie Theater” by Roland Barthes, I was able to find the answers.  The dictions “hypnosis” and “darkness” were constantly mentioned in the reading to show that theaters are the only places that could lead us to solely focus on the movie. I fully sympathize with this and was able to recall back the days before the epidemic; the time when I frequently visited the

Continue reading[Reading Response: Roland Barthes]

[Reading Response: Walter Benjamin]

In our tutorial Benjamin’s writing was explained to express his worries and fear of the capitalized of film and the possible risks that some creators like Hitler would use the new properties of the reproductive artworks to control the mass’s thoughts. This could be a way of interpretation. However, I think Benjamin could also be regarded as neutral to the age of reproductive artworks, and our eyes could be shaded by the eclipsing predicting power of Fascism and Communism to neglect his positive sides. The mass in Benjamin’s eyes may not be such “inferior”. Benjamin tends to support the existence

Continue reading[Reading Response: Walter Benjamin]