The paper mainly discusses the way of heritage conservation and the formation and recognition of Hong Kong culture. As Sharon Zukin said that “market” erodes “space”, Hong Kong is following the growth machine ideology, an irreversible and irresistible trend for the most metropolis in both developed and developing regions. It refers to a developing model that the land-based elite coalitions, associated with local economic possibilities, promote urban politics to improve the local economy and accumulate wealth (Molotch, 1976). But I still believe that development can coexist with conservation, and there will be a relatively ideal and reasonable way to protect cultural heritage.
Regarding the way of conservation, here are three common methods. The first one is to freeze it, turning it into a museum and not changing it at all. The second one is to preserve it while making it adapt to contemporary use. We keep its old structure, but we are still able to change it and make it a living thing. The last one is to demolish it or delete it. In Hong Kong, the role of art and culture in promoting economic growth has become increasingly important in urban development, urban renewal and heritage conservation. Some large-scale urban development projects aim to promote the development of the cultural industry and enhance the image of Hong Kong as a cosmopolitan city with a vibrant cultural and artistic landscape. So the second solution seems to be the most reasonable, preserving the heritage while making commercial use of the cultural resources.
LI WANZE 3035535121