Reading Response: Michel de Certeau

This reading material talk about the different method of describe those space. For different people, they may use different method, such as “map” and “tour”. This difference is also appear in stories of journeys and actions. For the modern science side, map is always leave the “tour”, but for long time ago, the map always use the method of tour to describe a position. The “log” is also always shows, but not the route. Those are the description  in describe space and from a space to another. The operation of space always with marking out boundaries. This reading shows the

Continue readingReading Response: Michel de Certeau

Reading Response: Michel de Certeau

Place is stable, limited by the boundaries that are set by the authorities such as the government and usually be symbolised. While space is defined by the users’ experiences and movements, different users have their personal interpretation towards a space, so space is more flexible. When a movement takes place in a place, it turns into space due to the increasing spatial quality. When there is an undefined empty space, people apply different usages to it, and finally give a name to the space due to the usage, the space turns into a place. It is crucial to distinguish space

Continue readingReading Response: Michel de Certeau

Reading Response: Michel de Certeau

After I read this book, I can understand the difference between place and space. Place refers to order based on distribution of emlements in relationships with coexistence. Therefore, place seems to be static concept. It can be found everywhere in our mundane life such as stadium. Meanwhile, a space can be explained as a practiced place. It can be created by factors of mobility. This mobility is someimtes involved in memories of the past. In other words, people give special meanings to a place. In the case of the national cemetry, it is created to commeorate people who sacrifice for

Continue readingReading Response: Michel de Certeau

Reading Response: Jennifer Yoos and Vincent James

Looking through the history of skyway made me reflect that such a common thing in our daily life is an avant-garde pedestrian system in the 1960s. I understand it as “socially produced and produces the social” based on Ackbar Abbas’s (2010) summary of the space. The skyway was designed to fulfill different kinds of urban city needs. From the view of city planning, this vehicle-free zone can help manage traffic while the interior connection makes people comfortable and safe. Commercially, the convenient access to multi public spaces (e.g., transit stations, shopping malls, leisure places, real estate) helps downtown economics under

Continue readingReading Response: Jennifer Yoos and Vincent James

Reading Response: Michel de Certeau

“Ever story is a travel story- a spatial practice.” If architecture is what turns a place into a space through designs and physical structures, then the people inside it is what gives the space its story and meanings. Thereupon, maps display simple directions of a city as a whole in an objective manner; while movies are like tours that bring viewers on a journey to view the details of a series of spaces. As the plot draws viewers to immerse themselves into the distinct spatial experience, the originally ordinary place is then subjected to their own perception and sensory, hence

Continue readingReading Response: Michel de Certeau

Reading Response: Michel de Certeau

This article gave me an initial understanding of the connection between place and space. Place is a geographical location that exists objectively, while space is more related to human activity. For example, if a movement from one place to another occurs, creating a new experience, this transforms the location into a space. This is similar to the relationship with sites on a map and tours. When a person is involved in a static location, they will compose a dynamic space from which the story emerges. The story provides the space to authorize characters to carry out specific actions within it.

Continue readingReading Response: Michel de Certeau

Reading Response: Michel de Certeau

After reading the chapter about spatial stories, I would like to share my opinions on one of the main issues raised by the author—Place&Space. The writer says in the text, ”a space is a practiced place.” Honestly, even I read through the whole text, I still wonder why this is the case, but not the other way round. To me, a place should not have boundary, but a space does. I guess this may be quite different from all of you may think of. Let me explain why: To me, a place contains not only practical objects, but also the

Continue readingReading Response: Michel de Certeau

Reading Response: Michel de Certeau

The difference between space and place is: place implies an indication of stability. In contradistinction to the place, it has thus none of the univocity or stability of a “proper”. I personally think that in most cases the extent of space is greater than the extent of place Larger, while places are more specific by comparison. So to a certain extent space includes place. However, the author believes: stories thus carry out a labor that constantly transforms places into places or spaces into places. Then the author uses a comparison between tour and map to analyze the difference between tour

Continue readingReading Response: Michel de Certeau

Reading Response: Ackbar Abbas

The famous director Wang Xiaoshuai once said that film is the gaze at time. This reading discussed the relation between reel time and real time, as well as subjectivity and objectivity, where architecture means no more than a dwelling of temporality and an element of atmosphere. I am particularly interested in this topic as time is closely related to memory and dream in my opinion. George Lucas used to say that film is the art of constructing dreams. Indeed, idiosyncrasies of reel time, blunted as presenting characters’ whole life in 2 hours and sharp as focusing on slightest moments, are

Continue readingReading Response: Ackbar Abbas

Reading Response

I think the relationship between architecture and film is the same as the role played by describing the environment when writing an essay. We can use the light and dark colors of the buildings portrayed in the film, and even the weather, etc. for the environment in the film, to maximize the role of the general tone and atmosphere of the plot that the director and screenwriter want to convey in this film. At the same time the audience has the maximum viewing experience to bring into the plot. Miao Luxing 3035917769